AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

test: convert truthy asserts in `wallet_miniscript` and `rpc_psbt`

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Lőrinc

95/100 · Strong
test: convert truthy asserts in `wallet_miniscript` and `rpc_psbt`

Replace the last remaining truthy asserts (and a remaining `is False`) in `wallet_miniscript.py` and `rpc_psbt.py` with `assert_equal`.

Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <*~=`'#}+{/-|&$^_@721217.xyz>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only changes test code. It replaces loose truthiness checks (like `assert x` or `assert not x`) with stricter equality checks (`assert_equal(x, True/False)`) in two Python test files. It does not change any production Bitcoin Core code, so it cannot directly affect live wallets, nodes, or transactions.

Recommended action

No security action required. This is a routine test-quality refactor. Reviewers may verify that the converted assertions still express the intended boolean checks.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.