AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 31 Bitcoin

musig: Include pubnonce in session id

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Ava Chow

80/100 · Strong
musig: Include pubnonce in session id

Multiple signing sessions over the same message are allowed. Including
the pubnonce in the session id allows distinguishing the signing
sessions.

This should be safe as a new secret nonce is used for each signing
session, and after the nonce is used, it is still deleted from memory in
order to avoid reuse.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This change tweaks how Bitcoin Core's MuSig2 multi-signature code keeps track of active signing sessions. Previously, the session identifier was based only on the public keys and the transaction hash. Now it also includes each participant's public nonce. This matters because the same keys and transaction can legitimately be signed more than once, and without the nonce in the identifier the code could confuse two different signing sessions and risk reusing or misplacing secret nonce data. The commit itself is framed as a safety improvement, not a fix for a known active bug or exploit.

Recommended action

Review as a defensive hardening change. Verify that all callers of MuSig2SessionID are updated and that no code path still indexes secret nonces by the old key. No emergency response is warranted based on the supplied materials, but ensure the change is included in release notes as a MuSig2 robustness improvement.

Security signals we found

01

MuSig2 secret nonce reuse is a well-known catastrophic failure mode (key recovery), so any change touching session/nonce binding is security-relevant

02

The patch narrows the window for session-id collision across multiple signing rounds

03

No CVE, advisory, or exploit code is present in the supplied materials

04

Change is defensive/hardening rather than a clear bug fix

Risk score

Why this scored 31/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.