AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

refactor: use PSBTFillOptions for filling and signing

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Sjors Provoost

93/100 · Strong
refactor: use PSBTFillOptions for filling and signing

Replace the sign, finalize , bip32derivs and sighash_type arguments which
are passed to FillPSBT() and SignPSBTInput() with a PSBTFillOptions struct.

This makes it easier to add additional options later without large code
churn, such as avoid_script_path proposed in #32857. It also makes the
use of default boolean options safer compared to positional arguments
that can easily get mixed up.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This is a straightforward code cleanup (refactor) that bundles several PSBT signing options into a single structure. It does not change what the software does; it only changes how the options are passed around internally. There is no security vulnerability here.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as normal code review/merge for a refactor.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.