AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 32 Bitcoin

psbt: allow signing green 2of3 txs with Jade as the recovery signer

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Mihailo Milenkovic

50/100 · Thin
psbt: allow signing green 2of3 txs with Jade as the recovery signer
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes how Blockstream Jade hardware wallets sign Bitcoin transactions in a specific multi-signature setup called Green 2of3. It lets Jade act as the 'recovery signer' by deriving a special recovery key from the user's key when the first key in the transaction looks like a Blockstream Green server key. The change is a feature addition to support a previously unsupported signing scenario, not a fix for a known exploit. There is no evidence in the commit or supplied references that this is a security patch or that it addresses a disclosed vulnerability.

Recommended action

Review as a normal feature commit. If treating as security-relevant, verify that the path-pattern checks (is_potential_green_server_path, is_potential_green_user_path) cannot be tricked into deriving/signing for an attacker's script, and that downstream script validation properly enforces the 2of3 recovery policy before the is_ga_2of3_recovery_key flag is honored. No immediate incident response is indicated by the supplied materials.

Security signals we found

01

New code handles private BIP32 key derivation for recovery signing

02

Sensitive memory protection (SENSITIVE_PUSH/POP) added around derived recovery key

03

Logic depends on path-pattern matching for Green server and user keys

04

No explicit bounds or validation changes beyond the new recovery-key branch

05

Commit message frames change as feature support, not as security fix

Risk score

Why this scored 32/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 5/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.