AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 12 Bitcoin

pytest: test failure if we crash after fundchannel_complete but before sendpsbt.

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Rusty Russell

75/100 · Adequate
pytest: test failure if we crash after fundchannel_complete but before sendpsbt.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides an explanatory body✓ Mentions testing or verification
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only adds a new automated test and a small test helper plugin. The test deliberately crashes a node between two internal steps of opening a payment channel, then checks whether the channel eventually opens after the node restarts. It is marked as expected to fail (xfail), meaning the test documents a known bug rather than fixing it. There is no production code change here.

Recommended action

Treat this as a test addition only. If investigating the underlying issue, focus on recovery logic after fundchannel_complete but before sendpsbt in the dual-funding / v2 opening path. No deployment or patching action is required from this commit alone.

Security signals we found

01

Crash during channel-funding workflow

02

Test-only plugin uses SIGKILL to simulate node failure

03

Test marked xfail, indicating a known unresolved issue

Risk score

Why this scored 12/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.