AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 41 Bitcoin

Only return valid data in sig slice

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Tobin C. Harding

68/100 · Adequate
Only return valid data in sig slice

The `SerializedSignature` types have an internal buffer and we track
the length of valid data in the buffer. However in `AsRef` and friends
we are returning a slice of the whole buffer. This is confusing and a
potential footgun (eg `sig.as_ref()l.en()` isn't be meaningful).

Make the impls that get a byte slice reference only return valid data.
Done for both `ecdsa` and `taproot` type.
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a bug in how serialized Bitcoin signatures expose their byte content. Previously, code asking for the signature bytes could receive the entire internal buffer, including leftover or uninitialized bytes beyond the actual signature length. Now only the valid, used portion is returned. This prevents accidental misuse where someone might hash, encode, or transmit extra garbage bytes as if they were part of the signature.

Recommended action

Review all call sites that rely on `AsRef<[u8]>` or `Borrow<[u8]>` for `SerializedSignature`, and consider whether `Deref` should also be restricted to valid data for consistency. Add regression tests verifying that `as_ref().len()` equals `len()` and that no trailing buffer bytes leak out.

Security signals we found

01

information disclosure: full internal buffer exposed through AsRef/Borrow

02

data integrity: extra bytes could be included in downstream hashing/encoding/serialization

03

footgun: length of slice no longer matches semantic signature length

04

partial fix: Deref still returns full buffer

Risk score

Why this scored 41/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 6/25
Stealth signal 7/15
Affected reach 9/15
Confidence 7/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.