AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 19 Bitcoin

Add an `ExpandedKey` key for phantom blinded path authentication

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Matt Corallo

78/100 · Adequate
Add an `ExpandedKey` key for phantom blinded path authentication

In the coming commits we'll add support for building a blinded path
which can be received to any one of several nodes in a "phantom"
configuration (terminology we retain from BOLT 11 though there are
no longer any phantom nodes in the paths).

Here we adda new key in `ExpandedKey` which we can use to
authenticate blinded paths as coming from a phantom node
participant.
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Names security-relevant behavior explicitly
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds a seventh cryptographic key to an existing key-expansion routine. The new key is intended for a future feature where multiple nodes can share a 'phantom' blinded payment path. The change itself only extends the HKDF output and stores the extra key; it does not introduce a vulnerability or fix one.

Recommended action

No immediate action required. Treat as a normal feature-prep commit. Review the follow-up commits that actually consume `phantom_node_blinded_path_key` for authentication logic and key handling.

Security signals we found

01

Cryptographic key material expansion changed (HKDF output count increased from 6 to 7)

02

New secret key field added to `ExpandedKey` struct

03

No security relevance disclosed by the vendor in commit message or diff

Risk score

Why this scored 19/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 1/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 2/15
Confidence 9/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.