AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 22 Bitcoin

support qr and file methods for signing messages via psbt when bip322 is selected

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Craig Raw

50/100 · Thin
support qr and file methods for signing messages via psbt when bip322 is selected
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit adds new ways to sign Bitcoin messages using the BIP-322 standard through QR codes and PSBT files in Sparrow Wallet. It changes how the wallet decides which signing formats are allowed and removes a fallback that previously forced older P2PKH-style signing for wallets that couldn't sign BIP-322. The main concern is that the new logic may let users select a signing format their hardware wallet or keystore doesn't actually support, or may mishandle PSBT files imported back from an external signer. There is no direct evidence in the commit of a vulnerability being fixed or introduced, but the change touches security-sensitive signing code.

Recommended action

Review the new format-selection logic to ensure users cannot attempt BIP-322 signing with keystores that do not support it, and verify that imported PSBTs are validated before signature extraction. Consider requesting a security review or release note from the project maintainers, as the commit message does not disclose security relevance.

Security signals we found

01

Change to security-sensitive message signing flow (BIP-322)

02

Removal of previous format fallback/downgrade logic (getSigningScriptType)

03

New PSBT serialization/deserialization paths for message signatures

04

UI enable/disable logic changed for signing format selection

05

No explicit security fix or vulnerability disclosure in commit message

Risk score

Why this scored 22/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 3/30
Exploitability 4/25
Stealth signal 3/15
Affected reach 5/15
Confidence 4/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.