AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 15 Bitcoin

refactor(core): get rid of the STATIC macro

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Martin Milata

80/100 · Strong
refactor(core): get rid of the STATIC macro

Relevant micropython changes:
decf8e6a8bb940d5829ca3296790631fcece7b21 all: Remove the "STATIC" macro and just use "static" instead.

[no changelog]
✓ Descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit is a large but purely mechanical code cleanup: it replaces the custom STATIC macro with the standard C keyword static across many MicroPython module files. There is no change to program logic, security boundaries, or behavior. It also removes build-system workarounds that were only needed because the old macro was being abused to expose internal functions.

Recommended action

No security action required. Treat as routine refactoring. Verify that the build still compiles and that upstream MicroPython's static-only convention is consistently applied.

Security signals we found

No strong security signals were identified.

Risk score

Why this scored 15/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 10/10
Evidence quality 5/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.