AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 20 Bitcoin

feat(core): set BLE connection parameters differently in bootloader and firmware

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by tychovrahe

62/100 · Adequate
feat(core): set BLE connection parameters differently in bootloader and firmware

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit changes how the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) connection behaves on Trezor hardware. It adds a way to request a faster BLE connection (used in the bootloader to speed up firmware uploads) and a slower, more power-efficient mode for normal wallet use. The change is a feature, not a fix for a known vulnerability. There is no direct evidence in the commit that it addresses an active security flaw, but changing connection timing parameters can have side effects on wireless reliability and power use.

Recommended action

Treat as a feature commit rather than a security patch. Reviewers should verify that the new `INTERNAL_CMD_SET_SPEED_HIGH`/`LOW` commands cannot be injected by an unauthenticated peer, confirm that the wider default connection interval does not weaken timing assumptions elsewhere (e.g., timeout handling, side-channel mitigations), and ensure the bootloader's high-speed mode is only active during authorized firmware updates.

Security signals we found

01

New host-to-coprocessor command interface added (INTERNAL_CMD_SET_SPEED_HIGH/LOW)

02

Connection parameter logic changed from fixed fast interval to conditional high/low speed profiles

03

Bootloader explicitly opts into high-speed mode, increasing throughput and power consumption

04

No input validation visible for the new command beyond command dispatch switch

05

Status flag bitfield reshuffled to expose high_speed state to host

Risk score

Why this scored 20/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 2/30
Exploitability 2/25
Stealth signal 1/15
Affected reach 3/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.