AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Low 32 Bitcoin

fix(core): re-implement `draw_simple()` to avoid scoping violations

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Roman Zeyde

100/100 · Strong
fix(core): re-implement `draw_simple()` to avoid scoping violations

Use a basic form of `interact()`, to be sure that passphrase prompt
layout will be properly stopped.

Following #7282.

[no changelog]
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Uses a recognizable type or scope✓ Provides detailed explanatory context✓ Explains rationale or failure mode✓ Links an issue, advisory, or supporting reference
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit fixes a UI lifecycle bug in Trezor firmware. The old `draw_simple()` function started a layout but did not properly wait for it to finish or stop it, which could leave stale UI tasks running ('scoping violations'). The new `interact_simple()` runs the layout to completion and returns its result, ensuring the passphrase prompt is correctly stopped. The security relevance is implied by the commit title and comments, but no explicit security disclosure or CVE is present.

Recommended action

Treat as a defensive hardening fix. Review whether the old `draw_simple()` behavior could have caused UI state confusion, overlapping prompts, or information disclosure in passphrase entry flows. No immediate exploit code is evident, but firmware updates should include this fix to avoid UI concurrency issues.

Security signals we found

01

Fixes UI task lifecycle / scoping violation

02

Prevents stale layout tasks from continuing after prompt should have ended

03

Passphrase prompt flow affected

04

No explicit security disclosure in commit message

05

References prior PR #7282

Risk score

Why this scored 32/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 8/30
Exploitability 5/25
Stealth signal 4/15
Affected reach 6/15
Confidence 6/10
Evidence quality 3/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.