AI-generated analysisPublished automatically and not human-verified. Validated context appears in community notes below.
← Watch feed
Informational 12 Bitcoin

Trustworthy sign_psbt amount/fee display for non-default sighash: integration tests

Public commit record

What the developer wrote

Authored by Ilya Artemov

60/100 · Adequate
Trustworthy sign_psbt amount/fee display for non-default sighash: integration tests
✓ Specific, descriptive subject✓ Names a concrete action or component✓ Mentions testing or verification! No meaningful explanatory body
The short version

What changed, and why it matters

This commit only adds and updates automated integration tests for the Ledger Bitcoin app. It does not change the app's actual signing code. The tests verify that the device now shows clearer, more trustworthy on-screen amount and fee information when a transaction uses unusual Bitcoin signature modes (non-default 'sighash' types). Because no production firmware code is modified, there is no direct security vulnerability or fix introduced by this commit itself.

Recommended action

No immediate action required. Review the companion implementation commit(s) that changed the sign_psbt UI/amount logic to ensure the security properties asserted by these tests are actually enforced in firmware. Treat this commit as test coverage validation, not a patch.

Security signals we found

01

No C/device firmware code changes

02

Test-only commit adjusting UI navigation expectations

03

New tests assert that negative fees are rejected for default sighash but allowed/relabeled for ANYONECANPAY sighash

04

New tests assert mixed non-default sighashes across inputs result in unavailable amount display

Risk score

Why this scored 12/100

Our methodology →
Potential impact 0/30
Exploitability 0/25
Stealth signal 0/15
Affected reach 0/15
Confidence 8/10
Evidence quality 4/5
Human-validated context

Community notes

Notes can correct, qualify, or add evidence to the AI analysis. Every note shown here has been validated by a human moderator.

No validated notes yet.

The AI analysis stands alone for now. Submit a note if you can add evidence or important context.